tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3507098756489505132.post5205372286961725390..comments2024-01-27T02:13:06.190-05:00Comments on Carol's Closet: We Don't Need No Stinkin FactsCarolhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17892433094729392295noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3507098756489505132.post-14448289673362044772009-12-16T18:07:39.820-05:002009-12-16T18:07:39.820-05:00There is a lot of back and forth on this issue in ...There is a lot of back and forth on this issue in the general public discussion, with the alarmists claiming Professor Jones' e-mails have not changed the physics involved, no evidence of a conspiracy was evident, and so forth. But the bottom line is the onus is on the alarmists to make the case. The skeptics do not need to prove anything. <br /><br />The evidence from the file dump indicates they have not been forthright in their presentation of the facts. That being the case, no actions to limit CO2 output are justified. No cap and trade, no Kyoto protocol, no Copenhagen agreement... nothing should be done. The topic can be studied further, but the moral authority of the alarmists has been utterly and completely undermined.James Nicholashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715293983358801138noreply@blogger.com